based

Logo wars go!

Now that you guys have seemingly gotten it to build properly, what are you going to do from here? Is there a major amount of telemetry that needs to be removed first?

I started doing some documentation while implementing changes to get Windows 10 apps to run in Windows XP

>>78677174
>>78676708
To unlock Windows 10 apps
https://rentry.co/kernel32-version-unlock

>>78676441
EncodePointer / DecodePointer implementation
I could not test it, but they are showing up in my built KERNEL32.DLL
https://rentry.co/kernel32-obfuscated-pointers

>>78678746
>>78678812
Hmm, I'm talking about another anon who did EncodePointer work too, not based on wine but on some published SP2 header IIRC: >>78111719

File: 1574030837089.jpg (147 KB, 918x1195)

147 KB JPG

Can someone spoonfeed me if anything ever came out of this leak and if anything interesting was found?

>>78678805
Telemetry wasn't really added until 8, and by the release of 10, backported to 7. I highly doubt there's anything going on in XP. Few people were actually connected to the internet at the time (especially in the early days of XP around SP1, which is this leak) and hardware back then sucked ass, so telemetry would slow the system to the point of not even working, which would be terrible for M$ since computers were mostly used by businesses.
TL;DR probably no telemetry.

>>78678826
>anything interesting
>Windows XP source code
You answered your own question.

File: 1596268218939.jpg (202 KB, 800x1210)

202 KB JPG

>>78678826
>>78678891
Look I know it is a bit too much to ask but of anyone can spare a few minuets and do a write-up (basically a gist of past threads) - that'd be MIGHTY appreciated

>>78678874
Even with the service packs? SP3 came out in '08 so I'd still be a little worried.

>>78678874
>Telemetry wasn't really added until 8,
what is CEIP?

>>78678913
The list of threads in OP has descriptions of what occurred in each thread. You have to scroll down a bit, but it's there.

>>78678950
Well, i think it was bad idea to specify "these threads", I mean on the interwebs in general to regards to the leaks. Like, a lot of work and tinkering also done outside of this little shithole, in other communities, and some of you probably keep tabs on new discoveries.

Basically some well-rounded summary would be super-nice and I'm fairly sure not just me would appreciate it.

>>78678941
As I said, 7 didn't get telemetry until an update around 2018. Windows 8 wasn't even that bad, either. Windows 10 had already been out for a few years by then. I doubt there's anything particularly fishy in XPSP1. Every version of Windows Professional has the option to disable telemetry, so it'd be even less likely for Server 2003 to be doing anything spooky.

>>78678947
oh fuck, vista onward is fucked i guess.

>>78678812
>I started doing some documentation
I appreciate that. I'm the dude with M-Disc archive for the post-apo times, so if you get everything in one place, I'll happily archive it.

>>78679613
>Offtopic but just wondering, are you archiving stuff besides the XP leaks too?
I have some cool hubble photos, a few games I used to play, but I'm not a hoarding freak yet.
I planned to make a full GNU/Linux archive with useful programs, source code and compilers.
I like the idea of protecting humanity's knowledge.
My motivation behind archiving OpenXP was to save the work you've done from bit rot, because that's the only thing I can do for the project - I can't code in C/C++.
The system is proprietary today, but copyright will expire one day and we can't trust corporations to archive it for us.

>>78679781
All the more reason to archive the previous NT leaks, OpenNT4 and Xbox src (Xbox uses NT5/2000 codebase)

>>78679855
If I only had access to it.

>>78678812
wow, nice works

>>78680013
They are all found in the large 43GB torrent in the info page in OP.

File: error.png (34 KB, 884x510)

34 KB PNG

Anyone seen this error before?

I am using Windows 10 20H2 64bit. I followed the guide by extracting the source into C:\srv03rtm, then patched using the v10.

>>78680236
you don't have to download 43gb... That archive contain shit stuff.To all why the fuck you are not reading the fucking guide before posting stupid question/answers? All of this is answered in the wiki page

>>78680401
I know, I was just referencing the size to make it easy lol calm down glowie

>>78680475
I am calm but you know is boring always reading people speaking of pack vs repack when if you read the guide you would had all answers :)

>>78680502
Calm people don't swear as much (: and I don't disagree with you it is very frustrating to have to spoon feed people.. but it also helps bump the thread

I have written a OpenXP License to give community some sort of license to begin with. I have uploaded it here. hope it reaches the Gitbucket
https://pastebin.com/8qj8aGaH

>>78680689
>I have written a OpenXP License to give community some sort of license to begin with.
Are you retarded? This license is not valid by law in every way because the code is Microsoft's property.

I am not a coder. What does building my own version of XP from these leaks get me over using my retail cdrom copy of XP?

>>78680729
>Are you retarded?
Kinda. In future this may help... I have included it just for fun purposes and it is written for helping completing the documentation. I just saw
>This Software is an unlicensed build of Microsoft Windows XP.
>The Software is based on an illeaglly acquired copy of the source code for the NT5 family of Windows operating systems.
>Under US copyright law, software source code remains the sole property of the original author. >Microsoft Corporation has NEVER freely distributed, licensed or otherwise made available
the source code for ANY edition of the Windows operating system.
>This Software should be considered stolen property.
>Your Use of the Software includes but IS NOT LIMITED TO the possession, execution, distribution and modification of the Software.
>Your Use of this Software is illegal in most Western legal jurisdictions.
Its just childish to include fucking lyrics in source code.

>>78680689
Hard to imagine why you would waste time doing this. It is invalid

What SKU is this? It's based on XP SP2 and XP Embedded.. but it's so bare, literally nothing installed with it..

If we can add a custom SKU (which we can with one of the scripts in the src) we could have custom build requirements for that SKU

https://archive.org/details/windows.-fundamentals.-for.-legacy.-pcs.v-2006

>>78680812
>Kinda.
This explains a lot, thank you.
>This Software is an unlicensed build of Microsoft Windows XP.
This is false. The software is licensed by microsoft.
>Its just childish to include fucking lyrics in source code.
You can always include a copy of "The Communist Manifesto" if you consider a song childish.

Placing a license there can cause even more legal troubles than just distributing stolen code, also it may be misleading to users of the software.
Especially telling the software is not licensed is wrong.

>>78680922
no it's XP SP1 and rtm win2003. But postbuidling on SP1 I think is still failing so you can only compile win2003

>>78680922
All skus

>>78681024
You misunderstood.. I ment in the XP version in the link, it's called 'Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs'

Someone bumped saying it, I looked it up and found an ISO for it

>>78681048
Oh yeah I completly didn't understand your comment. Sorry :)

>>78681071
That's okay lol, just curious because it's an extremely small version of XP, no accessories like Notepad etc, nothing..

>>78680954
>>78680812
What I mean by
>Placing a license there can cause even more legal troubles than just distributing stolen code, also it may be misleading to users of the software.
Is that not only you're distributing stolen code, but you're also scamming people into thinking the code is unlicensed/licensed not by Microsoft.
If you really want to be helpful, better write a short README explaining using the code is illegal and users do it at their own risk.
Just don't pretend you're writing a license, because that's just dumb.

Has anyone done anything with the WinPe build 2 threads ago? It's barely been mentioned.

>>78680954
never go full commie/socialist...

>You can always include a copy of "The Communist Manifesto" if you consider a song childish.

" Against Intellectual Property by Stephan Kinsella" far better :) also available as audiobook

>>78681529
>" Against Intellectual Property by Stephan Kinsella" far better :) also available as audiobook
Just don't put a license there and it'll be fine.

>>78681659
couldn't agree?!?! i am just a anon spreading Kinsella's book :)

Uh Guys what is this?
It looks a lot like like the Windows XP SP1/2003 source code folder.. but this one says :
"Windows 10 Technical Preview Source Tree"

https://windows-internals.com/source/files.html

>>78681929
It is just an NT file structure, but it does seem interesting.. 'Cortana' 'mobilecore' and a few other 10 specifics..

Can't see any build tools though so Partial, maybe shared source code..

>>78682284
I mean, I know there's still ancient shit in Windows 10, somehow you can get the OG file picker for some specific program.

>>78682297
That's only because 10 is still NT, and NT is just built up upon over the years..

This could very well be some 10 source code though, looking at the website they offer seminars and stuff on Windows Internals

>>78682297
How did you even stumble across this?

>>78681929
The folder name is 9364

There was even a leaked build of 9364 apparently

https://www.windowscentral.com/windows-blue-update-build-9364-leaked?amp

>>78682348
I did not, seen it on /g/, it's for something I've never even tried to use so maybe something related to policies or the registry. I can't remember what it was..

Well we have only file names that is not helpfull. ahah

>>78682399
Most likely some kind of shared source then, could be the training the company offers has/had access to that guild's shared source initiative

>>78682428
no idea what you mean, the thing I'm talking about is in all Windows 10 versions, It's just a utility that I've never used so I can't remember the name. It has something like the win 3.1 fucking picker though.

Also it miss stuffs like the HAL folder is empty for example, no ntfs in base/ntfs

But what is interest is that in this "codebase" there also the source of the linker and the c++ compiler. No cl though. And no ntos, what we have here is the minikernel that I have no idea what is it.

>>78682544
And the minikernel have the ntfs stuff. I guess they switch to this new thing?

If someone has a decent URL fuzzer, could see if they have anything hidden on their site

>>78682644
That page is just a single html page ahah

>>78678874

>no telemetry because no one had internet in xp days.

The fucking name is quite literately a internet emoji. please go back to posting in mine-craft and fortnite threads on reddit or whatever it is you kids do on the internet these days. xP

File: 0ae.png (58 KB, 600x468)

58 KB PNG

>>78682735

If any oy you can find the real file in the domain please download them before write ANYTHING in this blog :)

Any if this is anything it really do not seem win10 but maybe vista/7. They have some dx' stuff in. win10 ship with dx12. Also there is some reference to vc' that is visual studio ' that is 2008 ish ara so it seem more to replicate win7.

>>78682914
Nope I'm retard ther eis dx12 stuff. Anyway I think our hopes and here. ahah

>>78682937
>https://yanshurong.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/vista
No it seem a little bit more convoluted than that, I legit think it the source tree but just the ffile/folder names.

>>78683074
anyway if any would have the code it miss all build tools and build files, so make that compile would take years at your paste :)

So working on building, I was the faggot last thread when it was dying who's clueless. After build and post build can I make any of the 7 listed ISO's or is there one that works best?

>>78683720
Yes you can make iso of any sku you want

>>78683720
And if you compile base\ntsetup\opktools you can also make WinPE iso

>>78683902
Nifty. If I do that do would I go about making the PE ISO? Mainly asking in place of a bump.

>>78678754
nt5src.tar.lz weights only 2.4GB - compressed it with lzip

>>78684924
>nt5src.7z in the glowie torrent is also 2.4GB
I downloaded a torrent from one of the OPs and it was 3GB. Maybe the glowies use the right compression format.

When will I be able to use a tweaked version of XP made by you turbonerds as my main OS?

>>78685002
When you stop asking stupid question and help us.

>>78684971
3 hours later than last time the shitstorm got kicked up.
>>78685002
There is no ETA, maybe never. But we won't know if we don't try.

>>78685010


I'm helping by promoting it at least, what else can I do if I'm not a techy?

>>78685030
I'm the other anon that responded to you. Not much atm.
I'm not super techie, I'm working on building it myself.

>>78685030
>what else can I do if I'm not a techy?
Documentation and archiving.

>>78685023
I extracted the cabs from NOTREPACKED, made a tar archive and compressed it with lzip.

>>78684971
Well, thank you for letting us know, we don't care.

>>78685068
>Well, thank you for letting us know, we don't care.
No problem.

>>78678812
There is vert big hidden change, thread local storage. I believe that is the reason why visual studio has an explicit windows xp compatible tool chain. Prior to windows vista the thread local storage support only works for dlls loaded on application start, any dynamically loaded dlls do not get their thread local storage initialised.

>>78685948
Implementing thread local storage correctly is very tricky. Each thread has a thread local storage array, in nt5x this is allocated on application startup and is sized sufficient for any loaded dlls that have a tls directory. Dynamically loading dlls with tls directory would cause this array to be resized, but it cannot be resized because some code somewhere may have taken a pointer to this array, so on resize the old table is leaked until the thread is destroyed. The loadLibrary code must loop over all the running threads so that each threads tls array can be expanded as needed. Vista does this using a system call. It can be done in user mode using a linked list of all the running threads, this is how wine does this, and also how it was originally designed but never implemented in windows. But TerminateThread fucks this all up, terminate thread does not cause the threads teardown code to run thus would have the linked list point into garbage.

>>78686046
The original designers of NT never wanted terminateThread to even exist. Terminate thread is bad and fucks up so much, I wish it did not exist.

>>78678812
Another change that was made in vista was to correctly unload dlls that where loaded by export forwarders, in nt5x dlls loaded by export forwarders can never be unloaded.

http://mjsstuf.x10host.com/wp49/2019/12/05/on-the-hidden-improvements-of-nt6x-part-1/

>>78682735
>quite literally an internet emoji
>definitely not short for experience
fuck off, zoomer.

>>78685843
Last exinit.c that i seen gives BSOD 0x0000007b After loading drivers

File: error.png (42 KB, 979x512)

42 KB PNG

>>78687526
>https://pastebin.com/uwDWZ6ra

>>78684368
1. Add opktools to base/ntsetup/dirs
2. Run bz in base/ntsetup
3. Run tools\postbuildscripts\makewinpeimg.cmd from main dir
I did this from a folder that already compiled the main skus so idk how it'll work with a fresh build
4. tools\oscdimg.cmd winpe

is windows xp 64 bit an option here?

>>78687696
>makewinpeimg.cmd
makewinpeimg.cmd requires postbuild because it's uses ads sku to build WinPE

>>78687714
>https://pastebin.com/AzKU63ke
i made fixed version of copywow64.cmd and copytsc.cmd scripts now we need missing amd64 files

File: errors.png (147 KB, 979x1040)

147 KB PNG

>>78687713

Does the leak have system translations and did anyone manage to build the system in language other than English?

>>78687873
>https://pastebin.com/WzJJWLv7
it's builds. Now im going to try to boot it after postbuild

File: bsod.png (17 KB, 660x508)

17 KB PNG

>>78687873

>>78688095
could it be WPA blocking bootup?
I'm thinking that something in WPA is expecting a reply/challenge.

File: 1476913599654.jpg (274 KB, 640x492)

274 KB JPG

>>78678754
>Glowie torrent
Still asshurt I see.
Absolutely pathetic.

File: dbg.png (44 KB, 1920x1040)

44 KB PNG

>>78688095
idk if this can help

File: dbg2.png (40 KB, 1920x1040)

40 KB PNG

>>78688095

>>78678754
So at what point does throwing out the bad code for better code and killing all the bugs make it Linux?

Actually that's not a bad idea. XP with a Linux/BSD core to piss off everyone.

>>78688477
sounds great anon! I'll make the logo!

>>78688343
Man... do whats written there... SHOW TRAP FRAME!!!

>>78678754
is there any need for a novice x86 ASM programmer like me?

>>78688281
>memecenter.com

>>78688532
how much novice?

Do we just follow the commands in 'openssl.txt' to create new certs?

>>78680922
Found a .rtf doc in: admin/pchealth/redist
With instructions on adding a new SKU.. going to give it a go

File: problem.png (76 KB, 1868x602)

76 KB PNG

>>78688377
BSOD happens in ExpInitSystemPhase1 it's seems like here happens infinite loop

File: problem.png (34 KB, 1211x486)

34 KB PNG

Crash* happend in Phase1Initialization while calling KeInitSystem

>>78689536
Same BSOD happens without
#pragma optimize("y", on)
#pragma optimize("y", off)

I Just found out that im using pdb files from symbols not from symbols.pri

File: dbg.png (138 KB, 1900x956)

138 KB PNG

Error not in ExpInitSystemPhase1 it happens inside KeInitSystem for some reason...

File: dbg2.png (127 KB, 1892x876)

127 KB PNG

Here after im pressing F10 BSOD happens

File: dbg.png (86 KB, 1765x495)

86 KB PNG

>>78689967

I wonder how the NTOsDrop would be compatibile with this leak. For those who dont know, its basically a fork of WRK with nice features.

>>78679855
Already did :)

Can't compile optktools due to miss licdll.h.

File: dbg2.png (49 KB, 848x257)

49 KB PNG

Just switched VM to Multicore and stack gives more info now on BSOD

File: 1492644234003.png (231 KB, 410x410)

231 KB PNG

>>78678969
holy shit just look it up yourself you fucking lazy nigger

>>78690065
https://pastebin.com/raw/h9XHh5et replace base\ntsetup\opktools\factory\pid.c

>>78690088
WRK is fucking based on SP1 we are using rtm code. Make it to work would mean a lot of pain and wasting of time, as can we see we don't know windows internal and we cannot debug a bsod

>>78690088
So adding the features from ntosdrop? Especially that xbox layer

>>78690168
Yeah but the problem is that we don't have the knowledgement and internal docs to understand the kernel.

>>78690168
Also SP1 was the the most update in kernel that ms has ever done. so it's scary to merge stuff as stuff outside can still depends on those changes.

If Someone wants to debug exinit here is Iso , pdb files and sources that i used in WinDbg
https://gofile.io/d/6NOUk0

File: dbg.png (25 KB, 955x353)

25 KB PNG

>>78690285
+ Settings that i used.

When NTLoader starts Press F8 to toggle Debug mode

>>78690397
Forgot to mention VirtualBox Crashed without F8

>>78690446
I Tried this method with ntoskrnl it's just gave error that ntoskrnl corrupted(i guess postbuild signs or does something to ntoskrnl)

>>78680735
Nothing really.
The point is to understand how vanilla XP is built to know how to create custom extensions/fixes/changes. If you're not interested in that there's really no point in building XP on your own.

>>78690446
Apparently winpe was always obtain from fre build as there is a check tyhat prevent the scrpt to execute the postbuild for chk. Youc an basically bypass it and it seem to work anyway

Anyone got sources of NTOSDrop? I found this: https://osesbeta.fandom.com/wiki/NTOSDrop but there does not seem to be NT Kernel Monitor inside. Finding for "ntkm" case insensitive does not find anything in code. Dif between it and plain wrk shows some branding changes.

File: chimp.jpg (75 KB, 510x340)

75 KB JPG

>>78678754
What toolchain do I need to get started on this ?.
Windows XP x86 ?, throw MinGW at it, or VC++ 6.0, VS2019 ?

>>78690643
Fucking reading the wiki bro!!!!!!!!
Also MinGW is fucking shit over shit

>>78690626
NTOSDrop added in 2k3 SP1 we have 2k3 RTM

>>78690688
NTOSDrop is based on WRK not leaked XP code.
But available archive I found does not contain listed changes, eg. there is no kernel monitor. There are just branding related changes! Do you have full ntosdrop?

>>78690688
and SP1 was the major kernel update MS has ever done with service packs.

>>78690740
there is fixed copywow64.cmd https://pastebin.com/raw/ViiEY5Ys
and copytsc.cmd https://pastebin.com/raw/aqpMgwRp that copies files from x86

But we need missing files https://gofile.io/d/a8iNHZ this archive has some but there is still needed missing files that not included in Beta Windows XP x64

>>78690879
Yes. you can add it.
It's Copies required for amd64/ia64 files from binaries.x86fre. After this, Postbuild only should give errors about missing amd64 files (list of missing files almost same as x86 but it has some new x64 drivers)
Before fix this scripts was searching for Buildmachines with binaries.x86fre folder.
After fix it's now searches it in %_NTDRIVE%\binaries.x86fre

>>78691095
You rather also support checked build so you shall use the enviropment %_BuildType% to select the proper folder.

>>78682937
Maybe somebody can talk to this chink and ask if he has Windows Vista sauce-code

>>78691125
Fixed now it's searches for %_NTDRIVE%\binaries.x86%_BUILDTYPE%
https://pastebin.com/raw/fXYCDNr8 copywow64.cmd
https://pastebin.com/raw/8smUQ5v8 copytsc.cmd

>>78691217
Thanks, was just a small think but on long term dev should always be done on checked build.

>>78691196
After compiling and postbuild of x86
delete inetsrv\iis\svcs\cmp\webdav\davcprox\fhcache_p.c (it's generated for x86 by MIDL)
then launch razzle free offline Win64 amd64 and do bcz it's should not give any error

File: clippyded.jpg (299 KB, 1600x1027)

299 KB JPG

>>78690534
Thanks.
Even though I can't do anything with this hopefully it lets the big brains figure out a way to let XP live on.

My biggest problem with XP now is no modern web browser.

>>78691499
I will try that when my x86 build complete

>>78691281
>My biggest problem with XP now is no modern web browser
lurk for roytam1 builds of palemoon/basilisk

>>78691632
>inetsrv\iis\svcs\cmp\webdav\davcprox\
I guess I can't because I have amd64 file probably I create them way back this is why my amd64 was working ahah

>>78690720
BUMP FOR NTOSDROP CODE!

>>78678874
>I highly doubt there's anything going on in XP
You can't possibly be this dump without decapitating yourself with the spoon.

>>78688281
This.

>>78692328
cringe

>>78692692
cringe

>>78692692
Shutup! Get back to coding!

>>78692814
>>78692783
>>78692766
>>78692735
>>78692692
>>78692646
>>78692616
>>78692350
>>78692328
Russian daytime hours: technical discussion, progress, screenshots, build logs
American shitposting hours: cope, cringe, fuck you, NOTREPACKED

>>78692911
Sounds about right desu

>>78692814
cringe

So anyone having NTOSDROP?!

>>78691936
we don't need it fucking idiot!!!!!!!!!

Where in base/ntsetup can we.modify the setup strings (when booting of CD)

File: изображение.png (55 KB, 1426x752)

55 KB PNG

>>78693680
If that's what you mean

>>78693638
SHUT THE FUCK UP! I am not talking to you!

Who got ntosdrop?

File: изображение.png (68 KB, 1426x752)

68 KB PNG

>>78693680
>>78693724
Check all these files :)

>>78693724
Yeah I think it is, thanks!
I thought it would be in textmode somewhere lol

>>78693009
>cringe

>>78693766
Write back later about your progress and what file you edited, I was interested in this before)

Useless russian niggers. Gtfo of my thread, go back to infecting people with ransomware

>>78693806
schizo cringe

>thread is about leaked shit/hacking/malware
>russians start appearing all of a sudden
why? are all russian soi devs part of some mafia?

>>78693835
I will, so far I have just tweaked the initial text for starting the setup..

And I think ntsetup/textmode/winnt/(lang)/dntext.c has strings for the setup too

>>78693879
I forgot to infect you, sorry. Take the magic pill https://natribu.org/en/

>>78693960
This one was beginning to suspect something

>>78693724
Whats this program your using? it looks neat and exactly how windows search is supposed to be but microsoft broke it.

>>78694002
was CNN right all along?? all russians are creepy hackers trying to sneak in my compooter?

>>78694038
"Agent Ransack". Unfortunately, it is paid, but so far I have a trial.

>>78693974
Thanks, i will wait

>>78694038
Second this I also want to know what software this is..

>>78694054
Unfortunately, most of my classmates in college could hardly turn on the computer, lol

>>78694215
then why the meme about russian hax0rs?

>>78694198
Was that by modifying the background in textmode/users?

>>78693734
Fuck you idiot! Don't to brake the faking balls in a fuckign different thread, idiot.

>>78694220
Please share the location of the images you edited so others can too easily

File: изображение.png (70 KB, 1426x752)

70 KB PNG

>>78694261
>>78694273
I think it's here somewhere

>>78694232
>>78694232
And some of my friends are now quite a PC geniuses.
I think the problem is that many people in russia are left to themselves - you either do something and achieve success, or you are left to rot in lack of money at a bad job

File: 1505943160217.png (50 KB, 645x729)

50 KB PNG

>the state of this thread
And you guys are supposed to somehow "revive" Windows XP?

Can anyone publish ntosdrop?

>>78694520
Why all of you fall in love with that? Is something we cannot use!!!!

>>78694220
feels like something that can be done with just reshacking.

>>78694533
I dont care if we can use it or not. Id like to get kernel monitor code and apply it to xp

>>78694533
>ntosdrop
Also just fucking search on google for that and you found the eldorado that you are looking for

>>78694425
Russians do their job well, the shitposting begins when americans wake up >>78692911
Also CIA niggers do their job.

>>78692911
do 56 percenters really?

>>78678826
>Can someone spoonfeed me if anything ever came out of this leak and if anything interesting was found?
Schizos proved to be wrong, there are no backdoors.

>>78694930
>Schizos proved to be wrong, there are no backdoors.
Whatever makes you sleep at night, special agent Tyrone.
Obviously not every Microsoft employee has access to NSA backdoors, also NSA_KEY was found in the source code.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSAKEY

>>78694724
>>78694709
>>78694689
>>78694633
>>78694618

All of you kindly kill yourself, a second opinion? Use macbooooook or loooonix

>>78694198
> white text on white background
Are you retarded?

File: 1496790950016.jpg (73 KB, 466x492)

73 KB JPG

>mass delete
>new thread pruned
And yet there are still two /fwt/s.

>>78678754
an Anon said few threads before that he knows a guy who works in Microsoft who has Windows-7 source code in his harddrive. my question is where has that anon been?

also if your that anon reading this; Did you have success getting the source of windows-7 from that guy and are you planning to get it?

>>78695786
I know you want the latest toy anon, as this turned out to be a total disappointment - but rest assured, that was all fake and gay.

Do you have ntosdrop source?

>>78678754
Can you hear that silence? Finally there's a good atmosphere to discuss.
Janny dropped napalm, hope the kiddies got banned for some time.

>>78695786
It was fake, common on, he did not event provide any photo nor evidence.

>>78695886
It's faking findable by just google it!, Google it and fucking stop to ask the same question over and over again?

>>78695011
if im right, the backdoors are added compile-time

>>78696174
Give link. All i found is some old version without all mentioned features

File: 1566018579546.png (316 KB, 469x509)

316 KB PNG

>>78696177
Well since you have the compiler toolchain, you can verify that now.

>>78696198
Careful anon. These autists only survive because of their "turtles all the way down" coping mechanisms. Incels and novidiots are already on suicide watch, we can't afford the manpower.

>>78695011
also i think NSAKEY was windows 7 not windows-XP. if windows-XP had or has one i doubt it got the right version of the codebase before it was quickly removed

>>78696177
>if im right, the backdoors are added compile-time
This can be the case. I believe there might be a backdoor in MSVC, this would be a wise move - infecting/tagging binaries.
Anyway, if the backdoor isn't in the source code, that's even better for the project.

File: 1579932075191.jpg (44 KB, 640x759)

44 KB JPG

>>78696232
It goes back to Windows 9x.

>>78696226
Nah, they just instantly imagine another pile of turtles to camp on, as evidenced by >>78696245.

>>78696245
>I believe there might be a backdoor in MSVC.
I have thought about this before. They might have used this to tag malware binaries for example, so that when a malware is being spread and has been detected by authorities, if it was compiled by MSVC compiler then authorities could be able to verify what computer first compiled the first malware binary, and arrest the author

People are retarded!!! If you believe in a backdoor in msvc show me on the binary file! There nothing there how the hell you do that? Don't be so pathetic of thinking that water is gold! Otherwise you seem to be stupid and retarded! Why MS would wanna spy on us?

This thread today is extremely stupid. Where is anon that was trying to get a missing_amd64?
That is the important stuff not all of this other bullshit.

>>78696526
I agree I want to test the next changes for amd64

ntosdrop plz

is there any usable images ?
what is yet to be do if not?

>>78696716
fuck you create a new thread and stop with this fucking question. It don't help us fuck

>>78696650
yeah but I guess probably is better that they made the archive the people that have done so for x86

>>78696971
>>78696971
you are such a cocksucker

>>78696971
go outside and play hide and go fuck yourself

I am looking for the 2005 version of the *MS Visual C++ CRT Source* which is officially released by Microsoft, but can't find it. Where can I find it?

For better Windows 10 compatibility I want to add the *_except_handler4_common* function to the MSVCRT.DLL through the source code, and want to try again with the 2005 version as the 2017 version didn't not work for me.

I found this remark with Visual Studio 2017 installation folder, regarding the part I am trying to add:

/***
*chandler4.c - Structured Exception Handling part of _except_handler4
*
* Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
*
*Purpose:
* Defines _except_handler4, the language specific handler for structured
* exception handling on x86. First created for Visual C++ 2005, replacing
* _except_handler3, with the addition of security cookie checks.
*
* For the CRT DLL, this actually defines _except_handler4_common, which
* performs the real processing for chandler4gs.c's stub routine
* _except_handler4. We need a stub that is linked statically into an
* image, so it can access the image-local global security cookie. But all
* it needs to do is pass through to this code, sending in the address of
* the global cookie and the image's __security_check_cookie routine. This
* larger routine can then be placed in the CRT DLL.
*
*******************************************************************************/

File is *C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\BuildTools\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.16.27023\crt\src\i386*

>>78696971
Go stand in a train wreck.

haven't looked at these threads since the first few. glad to see the same old autism wars over whose torrent is better

>>78678874
>Few people were actually connected to the internet at the time

you must not be american. in the US, nearly every household had internet access by 1999. by 2003, the vast majority had broadband

>>78697162
you realize that if you not support all the other TLS+EH stuff that the modern CRT have doing so it's completely a waste of time? TLS have changed in win10 and it require kernel changes. This is the reason why in vs19 you can install xp build tools. Second that handle is exported by the MS CRT (mscrt.dll) and is not insid ethe public source release of the CRT you get with the SDK:.

>>78697467
So far, NOTREPACKED guys have kept with the oath of not fueling stupid fights... but looks like REPACKED idiots have kept bringing the subject since then. Hopefully anons will wisely discern who are the real faggots. But if not, is only their lost.

>>78697985
lmao keep at it, it's what makes these threads worthwhile for me

ntosdrop plz

>>78698071
Ok you are stupid, please stop If no onw give you the link stop asking for 8 fucking time bro! Try tomorrow!

AND AGAIN WE DON'T NEED IT, IT IS WDK STUFF THAT IS SP1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>78698095
i don't care idiot, go fuck yourself and shut the fuck your mouth you little pussy!

PUBLISH NTOSDROP PLZ ANONS!

>>78698132
FUCK YOU! JUST FUCKING GO AND READ WDK. DO YOU THINK THAT THEY CHANGE A LOT SINCE IT?? NO RETARDED.

>>78697678
All I want to do is to implement a redirect from _except_handler4_common to _except_handler3 for now and am interested in knowing how it was done in 2005. I will have to check a copy of Visual Studio 2005 which is available on archive.org

Can you please elaborate what are these TLS+EH things that are needed in Windows XP? I think you mean TLS v1.2, what is EH?

Yes, although it is a waste of time, the question is of theoretical interest, and it is hoped that a satisfactory solution of this problem will act as a wedge in attacking other problems of similar nature and of greater significance.

>>78698148
>>78698071
>>78696716
>>78695886
>>78694520
>>78693322
>>78691936
>>78690626
We won't give it to you, because judging by your posts, you are too dumb

>>78698265
EH is the exception handling that windows use there is three way vector exception handling, __try{} __catch and C++ try/catch.

>>78698379
and those Cxx function and that one is the backend implementation of stack unwinding during exception handling that the try/catch blocks generate and need to be parsed and handling by the kernel/CRT.

>>78698337
yeah he is and stupid idiot so better to not give him the juice ahahah

>>78691281
https://mypal-browser.org/

>>78695489
I think you know the answer to that.

>>78692911
Based Russians.

>>78694559
We actually probably can use it and will probably need it or WRK and the drivers and core from sp1 for amd64 builds to work.

>>78700180
Is this what you are looking for ?
https://github.com/pmache/ntosdrop
"An implementation of NT research kernel, compatibile only with Windows Server 2003 SP1"

>>78700323
I think he is looking for the version that has the nt kernel monitor that Kenneth over on BA wrote.

I see two versions of ntosdrop when i look around:
https://osesbeta.fandom.com/wiki/NTOSDrop
and
https://github.com/pmache/ntosdrop

as well as this thread:

https://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=11986

>>78697985
that's true. cozying up with the jannies and actively censoring people for telling the truth means NOTREPACKED gang is totally morally sound, and do not in fact at all lie about nearly everything.

when was the last time anyone saw a NOTREPACKED fag get all his posts deleted? never. however, this is the second time i've seen them ban everyone who dares to stick with the truth.

>>78687759

I have added all the missing files and am trying to get a pack together for them but i am not going to release anything without knowing that it works - Here is where I am at with an amd64fre pro postbuild - I used what I believe are the latest copywow64.cmd and copytsc.cmd files and still get these errors and need some help resolving them:

https://0bin.net/paste/rSKkBkqy#DIgdbFo8pfv5or0H6LH+LNlw2SqY3W08lgnJsY92s+8

File: accelerator_by_luisratedr(...).jpg (49 KB, 446x551)

49 KB JPG

>>78700816
NOTREPACK guys told REPACK guys how to come out from this mess in a civilized way... Yet they not only didn't wanted to, but instead they continued offending anyone who didn't agreed with them and their crusade to fight "NOTREPACK faggots".
So far REPACKED guys have got what their earned alone themselves.

>>78701188
>>78700816
>>78697985
Reminder to hide and ignore notrepacked vs repacked fags. No one cares

>>78701188
i've been following these threads since the beginning. it was NOTREPACKED guy who started attacking first, and now everyone wants to move on because "let's not objectively analyze the lies". Repacked crew is a rude bunch, they're so annoying when they bring facts to the table and won't back down.

>>78701246
>and now everyone wants to move on because "let's not objectively analyze the lies"
I want to move on because it DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER to the project

>>78701285
you don't think it matters if everyone believes in false information? maybe NOTREPACKED fgts should stop the misinformation campaign and give people actual choice in which torrent they want to get.

right now, many people are getting the NOTREPACKED one simply because they've bought into the misinformation spread about the repack.

>>78701298
Oh, are both not listed? I'm sorry, I thought that people could download either.

Bump for XP Embedded source

File: error_4.png (3 KB, 720x400)

3 KB PNG

>>78701046
Anybody have any idea what would cause this?

>>78702119
By error code i only can say that kernel corrupted or something incompatible with kernel

>>78702119
Try to use single core in VM

>>78702235
tried that - no change. got to figure this out. f5 to select a HAL after ASR text at bottom doesn't work either.

>>78701188
No, NOTREPACKED fag cast aspersions on the files and the people involved right from the get-go, and even continues to do so in OP. Wholly and solely because he was beaten to the punch, threw an epic tantrum, and continues to do so because people laugh at his childish behaviour.
Normal people take their silver medal and go home. But not this joker - he'll chuck his endless wobbly at the gold-medal winner in a way that would make even Trump die from embarrassment.

File: accel-whatev.jpg (11 KB, 300x168)

11 KB JPG

>>78702875

Bump.

I've done some experimenting and discovered server 2003 RTM has a kernel panic when more than 32 processors are detected - server 2003 SP1 does not panic and works fine.

how can i coom tribute to the project?

>>78703164
Know how to follow instructions? You can try building it yourself and test out the updates anons are pushing, albeit slowly. Or you can read through all the threads and try and get documentation on the project.

>>78700403
First of all, Id like to get NTOSDROP, not WRK, to see what changes has been made to it and extract several of them, like kernel monitor. Unfortunately, all links available over the net (to 7zip archive and github) are just what linuxlove shared and this is just rebranded WRK without all the changes mentioned on BetaArchive and README.

Secondly, there are some morons, who is posting another stupid replies about NTOSDROP and another guy replying to him. Two damn idiots offending each other.

So Im looking for full NTOSDROP. Anons, please share it.

>>78703789
I have it on my github. Just search.

>>78703825
There are just 2 repos: https://github.com/search?q=ntosdrop one is empty, second is rebranded WRK.

you guys do realize this is 100 percent illegal right?

File: err.png (46 KB, 979x512)

46 KB PNG

Interesting after second amd64 build it has only 792 of missing files (113~ missing files in each sku) instead of 896

>>78704062
clean build*

is v10 the latest update? repo says 5 days since last commit

>>78704471
>wopen3qf3trpihet.onion
hidden git? is it still alive?

>>78704505
it seems like, but has no activity, or at least not in the last 5 days

>>78703951
Fuck off, glownigger. Until 4channel gets taken down for this, we do what we want. Even after, we have other ways of communicating and distributing this code.

>>78703164
Jerk off to it and post a picture. Is there another meaning to cum tribute?

>>78704810
it clear MS don't really care on this otherwise they would have already done something! MS didn't even take down the youtube video the only think they did is DMCA the idiots, because you had to be idiots, that upload this to github. But nowdays in this blog there is only trolling people.

>>78704923
MS did take down Our Lord and Saviour NTDEVs videos, NT 4, and the two NT5 compiles.. Its just Mental Gaylord that hasn't been taken down yet

Remind me, is 64 compiled already, or is there a couple of libraries missing? Can I get them from anywhere?

>>78703951
Yes.

>>78705135
>>78704062
This is what missing

What about ntosdrop?

>>78703951
>you guys do realize this is 100 percent illegal right?
Do you think people are dumb here?
Microsoft's dirty monopolistic practices should also be illegal, but somehow governments don't give a fuck.
Spying on citizens is also illegal, but guess who doesn't give a fuck either.
The truth is copyright laws are not for people or creators, but for the ruling class to sustain their control over you.
>>78704923
>it clear MS don't really care on this otherwise they would have already done something!
Well, I think the massive shitposting that happens here for a few days already is an effect of Microshits or glowers.

>>78705351
What is this? There is nothing like this in source code.

>>78705383
modified wrk

Sorry for being a bit disconnected but what is the reason that WPA related code is not included in this leak?

>>78705351
>Stop thisFUCKING QUESTION, THE LINK IS ABOVE

>>78705872
GIVE NTOSDROP FUCKING MORON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>78705954
https://github.com/pmache/ntosdrop

>>78705872
GIVE NTOSDROP FUCKING MORON!!!!

>>78705987
THE LINK YOU FUCKING WANTED ARE ABOVE GO AND KILL YOURSELF IDIOT

>>78705976
IT IS NOT FULL NTOSDROP VERSION! IT IS JUST REBRANDED WRK! THERE IS NO SPEED OPTIMISATION, NO NT KERNEL MONITOR, NO ENHANCED DEBUGGING, NO XBOX APPLICATION LAYER!

WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND FUCKING IDIOT?

GIVE LINK TO FULL NTOSDROP PRESENTED ON SCREENSHOTS ON BETAARCHIVE, NOT THIS SHIT!

This is your brain on Windows XP.

>>78706012
>GIVE LINK
Nope. Find it yourself, idiot

>>78706012
WELL YOU WILL NEVER FOUND A OPTIMISATION CODE EVERY WHERE...
SECOND TAKE WDK AND OPTIMIZE IT YOURSELF, BUT I DUNNO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE KERNEL SO IT'S JUST A WASTE OF TIME. BECAUS WE ARLEADY UNDESTAND YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

>>78706045
If you care on xbox do your self! DO not pretend that others do the job for you, you are pathetic at least. (and this mentality is the mentality the 95% of the linux funboy have, I cite someone that said this way back on this blog, "the hard work is done by others". )

.

File: Снимок.png (62 KB, 1881x802)

62 KB PNG

Testing Jenkins to build daily iso xd

File: 1261274164.or.332090.png (7 KB, 640x480)

7 KB PNG

anonfiles -> V5L5Xepep1

Difference between WRK and NTOS DROP published by linuxlove. It is only rebranding. Do you see functionality from screenshot in the diff from link?

>>78706134
LINUXLOVE gave a fuck, posted some shit.

Now publish full ntosdrop anons!

I feel like the next Thread should just be called Unfriendly Windows XP/2003 blah blah

File: Снимок.png (106 KB, 1476x758)

106 KB PNG

>>78706122

>>78706831
Well before this maroons with repack vs notrepack and this idiot with fucking ntosdrop the thing was not bad

>>78707295
Heплoхo, нaпиши гaйд

>>78707298
another idiot

>>78680689
>https://pastebin.com/3z2KNqD9
here's your license bro

>>78707298
I'm trying as much as I can to keep this thread clean from them, but Jannies stopped giving a fuck.

dead thread

File: posix.png (18 KB, 792x215)

18 KB PNG

apparently there are some POSIX definitions in the kernel that point to a somewhat incomplete implementation from the OS/2 days, does someone have a list of functions needed to be POSIX compliant? ..maybe borrow them from haiku?..

>>78706139
and tinykrnl

File: file.png (120 KB, 604x969)

120 KB PNG

>>78707615
posix/os2 used to be included in NT as different subsystems, psxss for the posix one, NT4 leak has code for them, maybe could be added to our tree with a little work
afaik MS replaced it with interix tho, which being third-party code wasn't included in the XP/2003 source kit

File: file.png (36 KB, 484x927)

36 KB PNG

>>78707717
>>78707615
the NT4 code has a lot of files talking about getting it POSIX compliant too, if you want to look into that

>>78707717
>>78707738
that's a good starting point, i'll take a look to the current spec and see what's missing maybe we are close to be compliant

File: Снимок.png (112 KB, 1645x791)

112 KB PNG

Changed Build Branch from srckit to srv03_rtm iso size increased quite a bit.

VS solution when

>>78708050
How you can change the branch easilly?
Also why the hell we wanna support posix???

>>78708081
NEVER IDIOT, VS IS BAD AS HELL

File: daily VS update.png (16 KB, 955x237)

16 KB PNG

>>78708138
don't care, still going to update

>>78708156
well you will need to restart the pc otherwise vs won't start, just tell you in advice :)

File: file.png (35 KB, 698x582)

35 KB PNG

>>78708184
works on my machine

>>78708050
Did you change it inside razzle?

File: Снимок2.png (32 KB, 805x623)

32 KB PNG

>>78708120
in razzle.cmd find line set _BuildBranch=srckit

Also in makefil0 i did little change to generate BuildName every time i start bz in main folder

>>78708050
url?

>>78705351
>>78703789
Kenneth never released his kernel monitor code. Instead, he used tinykrnl to replace smss with, from the reactOS project.

I was part of the testers for NTOSDrop back in 2011.

Keep in mind that Kenneth (WinOCM on twitter) was just 14-15 when he was fooling around with the WRK to get NTOSDrop results. It wasn't pretty, and was FAR LESS of what has been done with this NT5.1/5.2 leak.

What you keep asking for is WRK mods, nothing that can be used for the code that we have here, as it is from a time AFTER SP1 for Server 2003. We haven't got any SP1 code -- and we know that it's a huge difference due to the fact that even Microsoft acknowledged it being one of the biggest service packs ever.

Server 2003 SP1 is comprised of backported LongHorn code, which we have none of.

Stop asking for code we don't have.

>>78708345
He is idiot he won't stop and if we have to work in kernel we really cannot trust 15yo boy code, and in fact he just ported from reactos as you said

Hey, I'm looking for smart people who know how reverse engineering work or who can program in C or assembly. Lets do something great together! Unfortunately I'm not going to tell you details here thanks to a lot of idiots coming around. If you done some work here and want to continue together, send me mail at "ntguy at protonmail" and write what you already did and what you can (programming, reversing, graphics)

>>78708622
>I can't do anything.
>looking for people who can
Let me guess, you want to tell these specialists that they will work for free for your idea?

>>78708722
No, and it is not your problem, because you are one of those anons who cannot do anything but complaining and look for conspiracy theories.

We won't achieve anything until 1 anon posts systime.c file on paste service, another puts winlogon archives and we have git repository where nothing happens. We need to create community and work together.

>>78708818
4chan isn't the place for that community you (and I) want, sadly I don't know anything technical like that (but I have ordered material to help me start over the coming months), all I did do the build-env-info site that people here seem to find useful but no real input.. I think most 'devs' here are either busy working or have left the threads to go to trash

>>78708872
Correct. But we need to catch all those smart guys first.

>>78708818
> because you are one of those anons who cannot do anything but complaining and look for conspiracy theories.

You did not guess right, I am constantly sending screenshots here and asking questions and answering others

> We won't achieve anything until 1 anon posts systime.c file on paste service, another puts winlogon archives and we have git repository where nothing happens

As long as you think that someone is solving your problem or someone else's at their own expense, you will not achieve anything. You should take and help people, do something on your own, if you do not understand, then at least look at the code and find something interesting in it that will help others.

>>78708913
Answering to all those morons? Hahah, no thanks. I have left a contact to me, all of you can use it and bring something to community. 4chan is wrong place to do that and I'm not going to discuss it here.

>>78709047
I see, there's nothing to talk about with you, good luck

>>78708238
It's seems adding Build Name generating to bz not enough to make build with diffrent build name. I guess bcz the only way for now.

File: US home broadband by year.jpg (27 KB, 695x414)

27 KB JPG

>>78697530
>in the US, nearly every household had internet access by 1999. by 2003, the vast majority had broadband
Absolute rubbish.

>>78678754
Bump limit, someone should make a thread.

>>78678754
We're approaching american shitposting hours.